研究者業績

柴田 友厚

シバタ トモアツ  (Tomoatsu Shibata)

基本情報

所属
学習院大学 国際社会科学部 教授

J-GLOBAL ID
201201011832796641
researchmap会員ID
7000000427

外部リンク

論文

 44
  • 柴田友厚
    技術と経済 13-21 2023年9月  招待有り
  • 柴田友厚, 藤本雅彦
    一橋ビジネスレビュー SPR 106-117 2022年7月  筆頭著者
  • Sanchez,Ron, SHIBATA,Tomoatsu
    Journal of Open Innovation 7 1-22 2021年11月  査読有り
  • SHIBATA,Tomoatsu, Kwok Shum
    Journal of Strategic management Studies 13(1) 35-46 2021年10月  招待有り筆頭著者
  • SHIBATA,Tomoatsu, Baba,Yasunori, Suzuki,Jun
    R&D Management 51(3) 1-16 2021年10月  査読有り筆頭著者
  • 柴田友厚
    一橋ビジネスレビュー Summer 20-31 2021年  
  • Kwok Shum, KODAMA, Fumio, SHIBATA,Tomoatsu
    Journal of Open Innovation 6 1-18 2020年7月  査読有り
  • SHIBATA Tomoatsu, Baba,Yasunori, Kodaka,Mitsuru, Suzuki,Jun
    R&D Management 44(1) 75-103 2018年7月  査読有り筆頭著者
  • 柴田 友厚
    『研究開発リーダー』(株)技術情報協会 2018年6月  招待有り
  • KODAMA, Fumio, SHIBATA,Tomoatsu
    Journal of Open Innovation 3(23) 2017年  査読有り
  • 柴田友厚, 児玉充, 鈴木潤
    赤門マネジメント・レビュー(Web) 16(1) 1‐22(J‐STAGE)-22 2017年  査読有り筆頭著者
    <p>探索と活用という目的と性質が違う二種類の活動を、企業内で分離させながらも共存させる二刀流組織の考え方が提示されてきた。しかし、企業内の探索と活用の関係性は状況に応じて異なるにもかかわらず、先行研究はその違いを考慮していないために有効性と妥当性に限界がある。本稿は、探索製品と主力製品の製品代替性に注目して、二刀流組織を共食い型と補完型の二つに類型化し、各々経営課題と有効なマネジメントが異なることを議論する。そして富士フイルムの詳細な事例分析から、デジタル化の波を生き延びた要因の一つは、状況適合的な二刀流組織のマネジメントを行った点にあることを主張する。</p>
  • 柴田友厚, 馬場靖憲, 鈴木潤
    赤門マネジメント・レビュー(Web) 16(5) 213‐232(J‐STAGE)-232 2017年  査読有り筆頭著者
    <p>企業が持続的に成長するには、現在の事業領域と技術領域を超えた新たな領域での探索が有効な方策のひとつである。先行研究は、近傍領域の探索に傾斜しがちな企業の特性を指摘すると同時に、探索活動を類型化した上でそれぞれの効果を明らかにしてきた。本稿は、先行研究が注意を払ってこなかった探索をすすめるプロセスに着目し、その解明に貢献することを目的とする。まず、探索の階層性という新たな概念を提示したうえで、富士フイルムとコダックの探索戦略の違いを明らかにする。そして両社の盛衰が分かれた理由を、探索の階層性に立脚して探索プロセスの違いから考察する。</p>
  • Mitsuru Kodama, Tomoatsu Shibata
    Knowledge and Process Management 23(4) 274-292 2016年10月1日  査読有り
    In recent years, there has been a growing need for strategies that provide for convergence in the development of products and services and building of business models that integrate different technologies and services and span different industries. The question is: What kind of strategies and organizations should a company construct for R&amp D activities to develop new products, services, and business models that will be realized through the integration of different technologies and convergence across industries? The key concept in a company's actions for adapting to (or creating) a worldview of such convergence lies in knowledge convergence through a boundaries vision, which this paper discusses. The paper presents a case study that analyzes in detail the R&amp D framework of Fujifilm as a company that achieved success in new business areas by realizing knowledge convergence through a boundaries vision. In the days of analogue photographs, Fujifilm stood alongside Kodak of the USA as a leading brand in the photo industry. Foreseeing the steady decline of the analogue business, however, it moved into other business sectors such as pharmaceuticals, health care, and cosmetics as a new departure that it refers to as the “second foundation” and, in so doing, achieved spectacular success. The main objective in its R&amp D strategy for the second foundation was to “create new value.” To do this, Fujifilm sets its sights on achieving what it described as “intellectual fusion” (by combining and integrating different fields and technologies) and “innovation” (by creating new, differentiated technologies) and, as a result, to contribute to society. We will now analyze the mechanism of knowledge convergence through boundaries vision in Fujifilm's R&amp D and new business strategy for supporting its second foundation, which was a key factor in its successful business transformation. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp Sons, Ltd.
  • 柴田友厚
    研究技術計画 30(3) 142‐151-151 2015年12月  招待有り
    This paper argues that existing theory on dynamism of product architecture predict architecture shift toward modularity even in the automotive industry that was regarded as integral architecture under some conditions. First, this paper review existing literature on product architecture, and then discusses several reasons why automotive companies are trying to transform the architecture from integral to modular. Finally, this paper raises three main research agenda that have not yet been resolved and clarified in modularity research.
  • KODAMA, Fumio, SHIBATA,Tomoatsu
    Journal of Open Innovation 1(2) 2015年  査読有り
  • Tomoatsu Shibata, Mitsuru Kodama
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 67(2-4) 289-305 2015年  査読有り筆頭著者
    This paper analyses how component manufacturers can change from a customisation to a product platform strategy. This change requires component manufacturers to deal with issues related to the product architecture of the component itself and to the product development process required to sustain the platform strategy. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the change in product strategy of Mabuchi Motors, a specialised DC motor manufacturer that sells DC motors for an average of 50 yen and that has enjoyed long-term stability and high profitability. The process involved in changing product strategy is analysed from two perspectives, the design concept (product architecture) of the DC motor, and its product development process. Academically, this study may contribute to enhancing the quality of product platform strategies by expanding these strategies from end product manufacturers to component manufacturers.
  • Mitsuru Kodama, Tomoatsu Shibata
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT 26(3) 279-306 2014年3月  査読有り
    Through research into new product development processes at a precision device maker, this paper discusses the skilful management of knowledge boundaries that lie between various organisations, and between specialised human skills and functions that make up a project organisation, and presents the ways in which new organisational capabilities are brought about for the development of new products as exploratory activities that dynamically merge and integrated the various knowledge within a company. This paper describes some of the implications derived from analysis and observations of the new organisational forms of the company's ambidextrous R&D management which the company uses to engage in both uncertainty management (exploration)' and existing product management (exploitation)', through the partnering of its existing formal organisations and dynamic structuring of diverse multifunctional teams formed as projects spanning different specialisations and capabilities.
  • 柴田 友厚
    機械システムの展開に関する遡及的分析研究会 報告書』機械システム振興協会 2014年  
  • 柴田 友厚
    機械システムの展開に関する遡及的分析研究会 報告書』機械システム振興協会 2014年  
  • 柴田友厚
    赤門マネジメント・レビュー(Web) 13(12) 477‐498 (J‐STAGE) 2014年  査読有り
  • Mitsuru Kodama, Tomoatsu Shibata
    R & DManagement 44(1) 75-103 2014年1月  査読有り
    This paper presents a theoretical framework under which large companies should be able to bring about strategy transformation. First, we present the concept of strategic innovation capability', a corporate system capability to achieve corporate strategy transformation by strategic innovation. Then, we consider strategic innovation capability by comparing it with previous theories (dynamic capability, major innovation, dynamic capability, breakthrough innovation capability). Second, we present the case example of strategy transformation at Fanuc, a company that holds the top global share in the numerical control (NC) market. In this case study research, we consider and analyze historically how the company aimed for new creativity in the NC market, developed innovative NC technology for the machine tool market, and used that technology energetically for commercialized products. From the strategic innovation capability framework, the core theory of this paper, we also analyze and consider how top management made conscious efforts to form a new development organization within the company, and the processes involved in achieving strategy transformation to establish competitive superiority in this field. Finally, we discuss the implications drawn from this case analysis, and the issues for future research.
  • 柴田友厚
    組織科学 46(2) 53-63 2012年12月  査読有り
  • Tomoatsu Shibata
    R & D Management 42(4) 358-376 2012年9月  査読有り筆頭著者
    Technological transition requires serious management decisions because it essentially means withdrawing from an existing technology, in which the company has been successful, and shifting management resources to a new technology with a high degree of uncertainty. We will analyze in detail an example of a successful transition to a new technology and draw key factors for success. The subject of our analysis is the transition made by Matsushita Electric Group (MEG), a large corporate group representative of Japanese companies, at the time of its commercialization of plasma display panel (PDP) TVs. During commercialization process, Matsushita made a successful transition from accumulated direct current-plasma display panel (DC PDP) to alternating current-plasma display panel (AC PDP) through incorporating AC PDP technology from Plasmaco, Venture Company established in 1987. Key conceptual contributions are as follows. Old and new technology can differ in their knowledge base. According to existing literature, when the knowledge base is radically different, incumbent firms have a difficulty adapting to the technological change. On the other hand, when the knowledge base is very similar, incumbent firms have no trouble adapting to the change. Beyond these established existing understandings, this paper argues that when the knowledge base is moderately different, managers can increase the likelihood of successful transition by implementing a set of organizational strategies. Among these strategies, a particularly insightful one is that through the parallel development process of both existing and new technologies, managers can eventually integrate the advantages of both technologies by implementing a flexible resource allocation mechanism to overcome the dichotomy between old and new through creation of a Ba, Japanese concept offering shared context for knowledge creation.
  • 児玉充, 柴田友厚
    商学集志 82(1) 1-31 2012年8月31日  査読有り
  • Tomoatsu Shibata
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 60(3-4) 281-301 2012年  査読有り
    Companies are faced with the challenge of responding to the emergence of new technologies. To reduce uncertainties, there is an incentive for companies to get involved in a new technology while continuing to use their existing technology until final decisions can be made, a strategy called 'parallel development'. Parallel development is good for companies because it provides more options and defers the need for decision making until uncertainties about the new technology are sufficiently reduced. However, parallel development does not just simply consist of developing new technologies alongside existing ones. Moreover, to date there has not been sufficient research into the management of parallel development. This paper will describe a framework of parallel development for successful technological transition, and then illustrate the effectiveness of parallel development through the successful examples of Fanuc, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Corporation.
  • Tomoatsu Shibata
    International Journal of Innovation Management 15(5) 1093-1112 2011年10月  査読有り
    With the advent of new technologies, one successful case of technological transition is Fanuc Ltd., a company that successfully introduced Intel MPUs (Microprocessor Units) to NC (Numerical Control) machines in 1975 and has since continued to achieve sustained growth. This adoption of MPU caused a change in NC architecture. Through an in-depth case study of Fanuc, we show how adopting MPU to an NC system destroys the usefulness of accumulated hard-wired architectural knowledge in that firm due to changes in architecture. We also show how Fanuc developed the new architectural knowledge necessary for MPU-based soft-wired NC systems. This study is not an analysis of the causes of failure, but rather focuses on the aspects of successful management of architectural change. By analyzing and studying a successful case, we can gain valuable insights into managing architectural knowledge. © 2011 Imperial College Press.
  • 柴田友厚
    研究技術計画 24(4) 338-347 2010年12月  招待有り
    Japan's machine tool production was in the top position for 25 years since 1982, but decreased in 2009 by 56.5% from the level in the previous year, lowering the rank to the third and yielding the top position to China. The technical level of the machine tool industry in a country is indicative of its technology base. What happened in the competitiveness of the sector of strategic importance even for its relatively small market? Examination of the official trade statistics up to 2008 permitted to discern the trade structure of machine tools in East Asia and Japan's position in it. It was revealed that Japan has always enjoyed export surplus in this sector, indicating its technological competitiveness intact. The author argue that a coevolution mechanism between the NC equipment and machine tools has been at work as an important factor that supported the development of Japan's machine tool industry.
  • 柴田友厚
    研究技術計画 24(1) 54-70 2009年8月  招待有り
    Technological strategy shift management for smooth transition from the current technology to a new one has become more important than ever for modern businesses. Many foregoing studies on this subject have, however, been concentrated on unsuccessful cases of failure and analyzed causes of the failure: few studies have given detailed analysis of successful technology transition. This paper presents a detailed case study on the strategy shift by Matsushita Electric for the new plasma television business. New propositions are presented on three subjects: (1) who (the top or middle management) starts the process of strategy shift and how; (2) how the relationship of divisions concerned with the new technology in relation to those for conventional technology (boundary management) when development projects based on the two kinds of technology proceed in parallel; and (3) how the old technology is abandoned to complete the shift.
  • Tomoatsu Shibata
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 26(1-2) 46-56 2009年3月  査読有り
    The modularity of products is progressing in many industries. This paper uses a case study to analyze the process of integrating personal computer (PC) and numerical control (NC) machine tools, and conceptualizes as module dynamics the product innovation that works in modular products. Module dynamics refers to the process of product innovation that occur in highest-order modules of modular products and that is achieved through a two-stage process of partitioning and integrating modules. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • 柴田友厚
    研究技術計画 24(1) 54-70 2009年  招待有り
  • 柴田友厚
    研究技術計画 24(4) 338-347 2009年  招待有り
  • Tomoatsu Shibata, Mitsuru Kodama
    Cultural Mythology and Global Leadership 343-358 2009年  招待有り筆頭著者
  • 柴田 友厚
    研究 技術 計画 24(1) 4-5 2009年  
  • 柴田友厚
    一橋ビジネスレビュー 56(3) 180-191 2008年12月  査読有り
  • SHIBATA Tomoatsu, Mitsuru Kodama
    Business Strategy Series 9(4) 394-400 2008年  査読有り筆頭著者
  • SHIBATA Tomoatsu, Mitsuru Kodama
    Business Strategy Series 8(6) 394-400 2007年  査読有り筆頭著者
  • T Shibata, M Yano, F Kodama
    Research Policy 34(1) 13-31 2005年2月  査読有り筆頭著者
    Almost all of the existing studies on product architecture adopt the research framework of comparing the advantages and disadvantages of modular architecture with those of integral architecture. In this paper, we attempt to propose an evolutionary perspective of product architecture. In order to consider the evolution of a product architecture, we analyze the history of Fanuc numerical controllers regarding the evolution of NC architecture from 1962 to 1997. Then we can derive the following hypotheses concerning the evolution of the product architecture. First, the product architecture basically evolves from the integral architecture to the module architecture, and then in the direction of open architecture. Second, in specific circumstances this change does not always progress in the same direction. When epoch-making technology, such as the microprocessor, is incorporated into the product system the direction of the progress in architecture may be reversed from the module to the integral. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
  • 柴田友厚
    組織科学 38(2) 69-79 2004年12月  査読有り
  • SHIBATA Tomoatsu, Masaharu Yano
    International Journal of Innovation management 7(3) 371-393 2003年  査読有り筆頭著者
  • 柴田友厚, 児玉文雄
    一橋ビジネスレビュー 49(3) 180-196 2001年  査読有り筆頭著者
  • 柴田友厚
    研究技術計画 15(3/4) 277-240 2000年  査読有り
  • 野中郁次郎, REINMOELLER P, 柴田友厚
    オフィス・オートメーション 19(1) 3-13 1998年4月  招待有り

MISC

 30

講演・口頭発表等

 45